2001-2002 Comparison of Planting Dates for Rye, Oat, Wheat and Triticale Varieties and Strains
by
| Table 2. Small-grain forage summary comparing planting dates at Red River Demonstration and Research Farm, Burneyville, Oklahoma; 2001-20021 | ||||||
| September 14 Planting | ||||||
| Variety and Crop | Clipping dates | Forage produced by 12/6 (%) | ||||
| 12/6 | 3/12 | 4/2 | 5/2 | 2001-2002 Total | ||
| Pounds of oven-dry forage | ||||||
| Oklon rye | 2,068 | 535 | 1,908 | 435 | 4,946 | 42 |
| Maton rye | 1,389 | 320 | 2,782 | 333 | 4,824 | 29 |
| Bates rye | 1,774 | 500 | 1,631 | 438 | 4,343 | 41 |
| Dallas oat | 732 | 108 | 1,075 | 2,378 | 4,293 | 17 |
| Harrison oat | 308 | 44 | 879 | 2,323 | 3,554 | 9 |
| NF87 triticale | 1,752 | 250 | 849 | 531 | 3,382 | 52 |
| Lockett wheat | 806 | 204 | 1,809 | 557 | 3,376 | 24 |
| Coker 9663 wheat (soft) | 1,178 | 606 | 1,006 | 547 | 3,337 | 35 |
| Jagger wheat | 1,137 | 429 | 827 | 490 | 2,883 | 39 |
| Average | ||||||
| 1,238 | 333 | 1,419 | 893 | 3,882 | 32 | |
| L.S.D.2 (.05) | ||||||
| 500 | 189 | 646 | 299 | 1,050 | ||
| C.V.3 (%) | ||||||
| 23.4 | 32.7 | 26.3 | 19.4 | 15.6 | ||
| October 5 Planting | ||||||
| Variety and Crop | Clipping dates | Forage produced by 12/7 (%) | ||||
| 12/7 | 3/12 | 4/2 | 4/30 | 2001-2002 Total | ||
| Pounds of oven-dry forage | ||||||
| Maton rye | 1,037 | 565 | 3,400 | 473 | 5,475 | 19 |
| Jagger wheat | 1,006 | 1,065 | 2,698 | 689 | 5,458 | 18 |
| Lockett wheat | 915 | 525 | 3,074 | 934 | 5,448 | 17 |
| Coker 9663 wheat (soft) | 805 | 1,138 | 2,328 | 927 | 5,198 | 15 |
| Oklon rye | 1,518 | 638 | 2,140 | 215 | 4,511 | 34 |
| Bates rye | 1,447 | 585 | 2,218 | 194 | 4,444 | 33 |
| Dallas oat | 9 | 57 | 1,426 | 2,791 | 4,283 | 0 |
| NF87 triticale | 905 | 672 | 1,898 | 804 | 4,279 | 21 |
| Harrison oat | 22 | 95 | 1,015 | 2,362 | 3,494 | 1 |
| Average | ||||||
| 852 | 593 | 2,244 | 1,043 | 4,732 | 18 | |
| L.S.D.2 (.05) | ||||||
| 198 | 480 | 444 | 363 | 720 | ||
| C.V.3 (%) | ||||||
| 13.4 | 46.7 | 11.4 | 20.1 | 8.8 | ||
| 1Influencing factors were the same for both plantings and are shown in the NF-FO-02-02 Report. 2Least significant difference. 3Coefficient of variation. | ||||||

